An incident heard by the Georgia Supreme Court on Monday may have profound implications for citizens seeking public record information beneath the state’s sunshine laws and regulations.
The dispute is mostly about whether a watchdog team may get correspondence from a Kennesaw State University teacher and a payday financing team that commissioned the college to conduct a research. The team, which calls it self the customer Credit analysis Foundation, posts reports favorable to your industry.
The Board of Regents, which oversees the state’s college system, consented that the communications must certanly be released beneath the Open Records Act.
However the research foundation filed suit to block its launch towards the Campaign for Accountability, http://www.spotloans247.com/ a Washington-based nonprofit that contends the loan that is payday funds favorable scholastic studies to improve its important thing.
A year ago, their state Court of Appeals ruled and only the inspiration, saying the Open Records Act “mandates the nondisclosure of particular excepted information.” (The Open Records Act contains approximately 50 exceptions.)
Russ Willard, a situation lawyer representing the Board of Regents, told the justices such a posture can lead to ridiculous results.
As an example, the Attorney General’s workplace frequently provides advice to officers that are constitutional while the governor. Beneath the research foundation’s reading of this legislation, Gov. Nathan contract will be prohibited from sharing that advice whenever required to do this by way of a news socket — even when the governor thought it absolutely was when you look at the interest that is best of this state to do this, Willard stated. Read more